- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
-
RSS FEED Subscribe Now!
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field
- The Ball
- Number of Players
- Players Equipment
- The Referee
- Assistant Referee
- Duration of Play
- Start / Restart
- The Ball In/Out of Play
- Method of Scoring
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- Other
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 22901Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 3/5/2010RE: Competitive Under 17 David Willett of San Clemente, CA USA asks...Contact significance in Shielding/Impeding: 1 If there is a shield (ball is playable) and the player holds their arms out but there is NO CONTACT. Do we have a foul (yet)? 2 If there is impeding and the opponent who is impeded runs into the back of the player impeding, yet not so hard as to be careless, that is still an IFK correct? A group of referees around here say if there is contact, it is a Direct kick. I can't find anything that says it MUST be a direct kick with contact. Thank you, David Answer provided by Referee Michelle Maloney Contact usually means we have gone from impeding to charging, pushing or tackling in a careless, reckless or violent manner - or we see holding which simply has to happen to be an offense. Contact is often the determiner of whether or not we have a DFK offense or not. However, saying contact always means it is a DFK is inaccurate - which is why you can't find anything that says it MUST be a DFK if there is contact. There could be circumstances akin to your example in #2 where the referee might choose to go with impeding instead ofa DFK. The referee must judge the facts of play as she sees them in front of her. If the player is legitimately shielding and not holding or impeding, there is no call to be made - contact or not. A player can be shielding the ball while in full contact with an opponent - legally. The referee will need to watch carefully and judge. An opponent of the player who is shielding is allowed to contact or charge the shielding player in an effort to win the ball. They cannot charge directly at the spinal area, nor can they charge, push or tackle carelessly, recklessly or with violence. The referee needs to attain a position that allows perspective on what is happening and decide whether it is fair and vigorous play, or unfair and thus an offense to be whistled.
Read other questions answered by Referee Michelle Maloney
View Referee Michelle Maloney profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Referee Willett 1. Player have a habit of having their arms out by their side in these situations. Many opponents expect this and a foul is rarely sought or called. 2. If you read the Laws on Impeding the offence can generally only be called if there is no contact. As soon as a player is guilty of impeding and it results in contact it then becomes a penal foul of holding, pushing, charging which is a direct free kick restart.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 22901
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
This page is Sponsored by eSourceAgent.com a Realtor Marketing Agency.
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members.
|